And nothing!
Well, well, came the turn of this film. Just think, 10 years have passed, as he was given an Oscar, but still nothing. It was interesting. Before watching, I mean. It was interesting and on time. And in general, the impressions were more positive than negative. To delight, of course, it does not pull, but ... This is a good film, I tell you.
First, of course, the actors. And, interestingly, not those that played the main roles - these I was just not impressed, but those that were “on the outskirts”. And there are several of them at once: D. Rush - this is understandable - smart mimicry, B. Affleck - oddly enough (the role - it seemed, nothing at all) liked - a good hit, I suppose, just disappeared into his hero, T. Wilkinson - I note his skill not the first time (the Apothecary’s rehearsals are strong), and D. Dench didn’t know that she was also given a statuette, but in my opinion, why not, the queen turned out to be memorable. What else would like to point out.
Costumes and scenery. Very reminded of "Perfume", although, according to the logic of things, it should have been the other way around. Very natural. Respect. Again, humor. Only the lazy one did not mention, probably, about the dog, but this is, indeed, a good topic.
In general, it is a quality movie. And for his masterpiece he lacked, in my opinion, first of all, a strong acting game on the first line. Although Mr. Paltrow received Oscar for this role - I don’t know, I’m not sure about the case. Colin Firth is even less convincing - perhaps just the wrong type. Well, D. Fiennes is the best, in my opinion, of this trio, but, nevertheless, not bright enough in itself.
As a result, the love story of the main characters falls out of the film, and the story of the creation of an immortal work comes to the fore. This, of course, is not bad, but it seems that something else was conceived (judging by the name). It did not work, or simply I overlooked something - who knows? But my assessment is
8 out of 10
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий